Large-scale examination of the benefit and cost of spatial attention and their individual variability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21307249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Felipe Luzardo (0000-0001-6130-6044, University of Haifa, corresponding author), Yaffa Yeshurun (0000-0003-0513-9290, University of Haifa) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 264 |
| Pages | 106242 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106242 |
| PMID | 40663983 |
| OpenAlex | W4412422895 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 77 |
Spatial attention-the ability to prioritize relevant regions in the environment-is crucial for human cognition and has accordingly been studied extensively. However, large population samples have seldom been used, leaving inter-individual variability largely unexamined. This is especially true for the distinction between attentional benefit (improved performance when attending the correct location) and cost (impaired performance when attending the wrong location), which is critical for distinguishing facilitatory from inhibitory mechanisms. This distinction is sometimes avoided because it requires a baseline condition and choosing a truly neutral cue for this condition can be challenging. Here, we recruited a sizable participant pool (N = 662) across four experiments. We combined an acuity task with valid, invalid, and neutral pre-cues of different types and analyzed the averaged attentional benefits and costs and their inter-individual variability. We found robust attentional benefits, but attentional costs depended on inter-stimulus distance, highlighting the importance of employing neutral cues. Similar patterns of attentional benefit and cost emerged for the experiments that used different types of neutral cues. Moreover, when neutral cues were compared directly no difference in performance was found. These findings suggest that the neutral cue's characteristics are not critical. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses revealed true qualitative individual differences; while most individuals showed effects in the expected direction, some exhibited effects in the opposite direction. This finding emphasizes the complexity of attentional allocation, suggesting that a comprehensive account of spatial attention needs to incorporate several underlying mechanisms including factors that may result in attentional effects in the opposite direction
Cartography · Cognitive psychology · Scale (ratio) · Psychology · Spatial Cognition and Navigation · Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction · Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Reactions toward the source of stimulation.
Optional stopping
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Bayes factor design analysis
Visual attention
The Attention System of the Human Brain
PsychoPy2
BRMS
Categorical data analysis
The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization
Individual Differences in Cue Weighting in Sentence Comprehension
Who shows the Unlikelihood Effect – and why
Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture
Inter-individual variations in internal noise predict the effects of spatial attention
Orienting of Attention
On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit
| Highly cited | No |
|---|