Verbal working memory encodes phonological and semantic information differently
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21307355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin Kowialiewski (0000-0002-7743-761X, University of Liège, corresponding author), Julia Krasnoff (University of Zurich), Eda Mızrak (0000-0002-1765-7047, University of Zurich), E Mizrak, Klaus Oberauer (0000-0003-3902-7318, University of Zurich) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 233 |
| Pages | 105364 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105364 |
| PMID | 36584522 |
| OpenAlex | W4313204147 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 62 |
Working memory (WM) is often tested through immediate serial recall of word lists. Performance in such tasks is negatively influenced by phonological similarity: People more often get the order of words wrong when they are phonologically similar to each other (e.g., cat, fat, mat). This phonological-similarity effect shows that phonology plays an important role for the representation of serial order in these tasks. By contrast, semantic similarity usually does not impact performance negatively. To resolve and understand this discrepancy, we tested the effects of phonological and semantic similarity for the retention of positional information in WM. Across six experiments (all Ns = 60 young adults), we manipulated between-item semantic and phonological similarity in tasks requiring participants to form and maintain new item-context bindings in WM. Participants were asked to retrieve items from their context, or the contexts from their item. For both retrieval directions, phonological similarity impaired WM for item-context bindings across all experiments. Semantic similarity did not. These results demonstrate that WM encodes phonological and semantic information differently. We propose a WM model accounting for semantic-similarity effects in WM, in which semantic knowledge supports WM through activated long-term memory
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Phonology · Recall · Semantic memory · Semantic similarity · Short-term memory · Similarity (geometry) · Working memory · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Memory Processes and Influences · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology
From stork to baby
Leveraging semantics in working memory to maintain bindings and modulate the impact of age
Semantic relatedness can impair memory for item locations
Children’s use of semantic elaboration in immediate serial order memory
Working memory capacity limit is dependent on encoding granularity
An embedded computational framework of memory
Low-frequency neural activity tracks syntactic information through semantic mediation
Models of Working Memory
Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity
Chapter 2 Design for a Working Memory
Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.
A solution to Plato's problem
A temporal ratio model of memory.
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
BRMS
The detrimental effect of semantic similarity in short-term memory tasks
How does semantic knowledge impact working memory maintenance? Computational and behavioral investigations
A model of the production effect over the short-term
| Citations per year | 3.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |