What Else Do We Know? Translingualism and the History of SRTOL as Threshold Concepts in Our Field
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21307828 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tessa Brown (0000-0002-1223-1055, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 591-619 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | College Composition and Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-096X • E-ISSN: 1939-9006 |
| Publisher | National Council of Teachers of English (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.58680/ccc202030726 |
| OpenAlex | W4385821436 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 23 |
This article uses storytelling, rhetorical analysis, and critical historicization to critique the color-blindness of the writing studies movement’s two key texts, Elizabeth Wardle and Douglas Down’s Writing about Writing reader and Linda Adler-Kassner and Wardle’s edited collection Naming What We Know . Juxtaposing the writing studies movement with contemporary translingual and hip-hop theory as well as the history of the Students’ Right to Their Own language resolution and CUNY’s Open Admissions period, the author argues that the writing studies movement’s pivot toward neoliberalizing higher education excludes multilingual and diverse writers from its pedagogical audience as well as its conception of writing expertise. The author calls for a broader conception of writing studies that can theorize literacy in all its complex global instantiations
Aesthetics · Art · Field (mathematics) · Key (lock) · Linguistics · Literacy · Literature · Narrative · Pedagogy · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Storytelling · Visual arts · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Second Language Learning and Teaching
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |