From theory to empirical research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2131060 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christoph Ulf (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 96-100 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological Dialogues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1380-2038 • E-ISSN: 1478-2294 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1380203810000115 |
| OpenAlex | W1986764406 |
| Language | EN |
Sofia Voutsaki has developed a very stimulating line of thought in her paper. In my view, one of the laudable traits of this paper is that it is characterized by the same tripartite structure which actually lies behind each scientific argument. Consciously or not, all of us start with a theory or a set of assumptions; we then proceed to methods in order to achieve our goal, i.e. to arrive at transparent interpretations of the past through empirical analysis. The analysis of empirical data is the end of the process, not its starting point, even if many people think it would be the beginning of our daily research work. The claim that the use of theory is unavoidable is often denied. Sofia Voutsaki's goal, as I understand it, is to make an attempt to narrow the gap between, on the one hand, mainly theory-driven research and, on the other, empirical analysis which is thought to be free from the unnecessary 'burden' of theory
Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Scientific theory · Sociology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|