Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Avoid Avoiding the Wishful Thinking Problem

Bibliographic Data

ID21311432
AuthorsAdam Patterson (0000-0003-0351-3402, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume77
Issue3
Pages257-270
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
Venuedialectica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2017 • E-ISSN: 1746-8361
PublisherVerein philosophie.ch (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.48106/dial.v77.i3.01
OpenAlexW4414752847
LanguageEN

The wishful thinking problem purported to be a new problem for pure non-cognitivist expressivist views in metaethics in addition to the similar, yet distinct, Frege-Geach problem. After a smattering of initial responses, discussion of the problem has faded. One might think this is because the responses were fatal, and the problem is not really a problem. I do not think so. I aim to re-start discussion of the wishful thinking problem. I do so by recasting it in terms of the distinction between propositional and doxastic justification. Doing so is instructive, for it shows some of the initial, prominent responses to the problem fail. The problem is thus not as dead as one might otherwise think

Agnosticism · Doxastic logic · Expressivism · Wishful thinking · Education and Critical Thinking Development

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae