A multi-species archaeology
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
ANO | 2013 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Archaeological Dialogues |
ISSN | 1380-2038 |
E-ISSN | 1478-2294 |
EDITORA | Cambridge University Press |
DOI | 10.1017/s1380203813000214 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
d6b2ceaecee1506e8105e7513f714315
|
Resumo
These are interesting times for the exploration of the relationships between humans and other animals. The 'animal turn' is in full swing in a number of disciplines; anthropologists have started talking of the emergence of a multi-species ethnography (Kirksey and Helmreich 2010); and even archaeologists have, somehow hesitantly, started contributing to wider discussions within animal studies (e.g. see the recent – 2013 – special issue of the journalSociety and animalsdevoted to archaeology; and Harris and Hamilakis, in press). Another indication that things are changing is the overwhelmingly positive response to our 'manifesto' by most commentators, who have offered many valuable thoughts which expand our reflections in many and interesting directions: we are grateful. Rather than trying to comment on every single point raised in this discussion, which in any case would have been impossible in the space provided, we have selected instead a couple of issues that, we hope, readers will find engaging and fruitful.
Referências Citadas
(2020)