The Primitivist Response to the Inference Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21311468 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Austin Coates (0000-0001-8557-3163, corresponding author), Ashley Coates |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 509-532 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | dialectica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2017 • E-ISSN: 1746-8361 |
| Publisher | Verein philosophie.ch (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.48106/dial.v75.i4.02 |
| OpenAlex | W4414752638 |
| Language | EN |
While the inference problem is widely thought to be one of the most serious problems facing non-Humean accounts of laws, Jonathan Schaffer has argued that a primitivist response straightforwardly dissolves the problem. On this basis, he claims that the inference problem is really a pseudo-problem. Here I clarify the prospects of a primitivist response to the inference problem and their implications for the philosophical significance of the problem. I argue both that it is a substantial question whether this sort of response ought to be accepted and that the inference problem, contra Schaffer, remains a significant problem with important implications for the non-Humean position. I also argue that this discussion indicates grounds to be wary about applying the Schaffer-style strategy of straightforwardly dissolving problems by stipulation to other philosophical problems
Inference · Interpretation (philosophy) · sort · Stipulation · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |