Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) V. Strang
ANO 2014
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Archaeological Dialogues
ISSN 1380-2038
E-ISSN 1478-2294
EDITORA Cambridge University Press
DOI 10.1017/s1380203814000191
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 24584a52d45e18c74c06a78f26697063

Resumo

I am happy to see that my essay has generated a lively discussion, and am most grateful to the respondents for their insightful contributions. Their comments express varying levels of agreement regarding the agency of things. Vernon Scarborough revisits anxieties about whether agency implies intentionality. Using the term 'agency' is indeed problematic if we assume that it entails sentience or intentionality (and I do not), but if we define it more precisely as a capacity to act (upon), it is possible to excise intentionality from the equation. This simultaneously allows us to acknowledge the agentive capacities of things without proposing or implying a form of faux animism. Anthropology has indeed drawn imaginatively on specifically cultural beliefs and knowledges, for example in composing more relational visions of human–other interactions than Western science tends to allow (see Strang 2006a), but this is not tantamount to assuming that things contain spiritual presence, or have 'their own sense of agency'.

Ferramentas