Risk Attitudes and Justifiability to Each
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21315944 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pietro Cibinel (0000-0002-4009-3593, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 133 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 106-121 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0014-1704 • E-ISSN: 1539-297X |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/720777 |
| OpenAlex | W4296533969 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
How should we choose on behalf of people with different attitudes to risk? Simon Blessenohl has recently argued that this question poses a dilemma: it seems that sometimes we must choose either acts that everyone disprefers or else acts that are sure to turn out worse than some other act. In this article, I offer a complaints-centered account of how to take people’s attitudes to risk into consideration in our decision-making, and then I show that it provides a way out of Blessenohl’s dilemma
Political science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology
Risk and Rationality
The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?
A theory of anticipated utility
Contractualism's (Not So) Slippery Slope
Contractualism and risk preferences
Risks and Weak Aggregation
Rank-Weighted Utilitarianism and the Veil of Ignorance
On Ex Ante Contractualism
Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility
Philosophical Studies
Risking and Wronging
Limited Aggregation and Risk
Aggregation, Complaints, and Risk
Contractualism and Social Risk
Taking Risks on Behalf of Another
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |