Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

First Come, First Served

Bibliographic Data

ID21316049
AuthorsTyler M John (0000-0002-9381-0023), Joseph Millum (0000-0003-0716-9880)
Year2020
Volume130
Issue2
Pages179-207
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0014-1704 • E-ISSN: 1539-297X
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/705763
OpenAlexW2970763864
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited20

Waiting time is widely used in health and social policy to make resource allocation decisions, yet no general account of the moral significance of waiting time exists. We provide such an account. We argue that waiting time is not intrinsically morally significant, but its use is justified across a range of pretheoretically compelling scenarios. First, there is a duty of fairness prohibiting line cutting where a sufficiently just queue exists. Second, where candidates are in relevantly similar circumstances, allocating by waiting time is efficient, maximizes distribution equality relative to other Pareto efficient distributions, and approaches the fairness of an equiprobable lottery

Economics · Management · Operations research · Resource allocation · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Systems and Challenges

  • What makes a health system good? From cost-effectiveness analysis to ethical improvement in health systems

    Open Access•James Wilson•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2023

  • Using a lottery to resolve indeterminacy when allocating resources for drugs for rare diseases

    Open Access•Kenneth Bond, Lars Sandman et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • What is fair? Ethical analysis of triage criteria and disability rights during the Covid-19 pandemic and the German legislation

    Elena Ana Francesca Göttert•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Should age matter in Covid-19 triage? A deliberative study

    Open Access•Margot Kuylen, Scott Y H Kim et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • Procedural Fairness in Exchange Matching Systems

    Open Access•Gil Hersch•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Allocative Fairness

    Open Access•Gil Hersch, Thomas Rowe•Philosophy Compass•2025

  • Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

    Open Access•Govind Persad, Alan Wertheimer et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Egalitarianism and the levelling down objection

    Nils Holtug•Analysis•1998

  • V—Fairness

    John Broome•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1991

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Reasonable Disagreement about Identifed vs. Statistical Victims

    Open Access•Norman Daniels•The Hastings Center Report•2012

  • David Lewis's Humean Theory of Objective Chance

    Open Access•Barry Loewer•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • From Choice to Chance? Saving People, Fairness, and Lotteries

    Tim Henning•The Philosophical Review•2015

  • Are There Any Natural Rights

    H L A Hart•The Philosophical Review•1955

  • Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility

    Peter A Diamond, Peter Dia­mond•Journal of Political Economy•1967

  • The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes

    Hugh Dalton•The Economic Journal•1920

  • Contractualism and Social Risk

    Open Access•Johann Frick•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2015

  • Just lotteries

    Open Access•Lewis A Kornhauser, Lawrence G Sager•Social Science Information•1988

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1.2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae