What Australia’s new psychology Code of Conduct means for LGBTQ+ ethical practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21323909 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacob Thomas (0000-0003-3537-8962, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), R Grant (0000-0003-3007-0168, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Joel Anderson (0000-0003-3649-2003, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Education Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0017-8969 • E-ISSN: 1748-8176 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00178969261457771 |
| OpenAlex | W7166705968 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
In December 2025, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency introduced a new Code of Conduct for registered psychologists, replacing the Australian Psychological Society’s long-standing Code of Ethics. While regulatory reform is routine, this transition represents a significant shift in how ethical obligations are articulated, governed, and enforced, with implications for how psychologists are trained and supported to work ethically with LGBTQ+ clients. This paper examines how previous ethical guidance framed LGBTQ+ health and well-being, identifying conceptual omissions, dated assumptions, and uneven coverage across LGBTQ+ subpopulations. Drawing on this analysis, we consider how the new Code of Conduct might address – or risk reproducing – existing practice gaps, with a focus on competence, confidence, and accountability when working with marginalised subgroups. We discuss the implications for education, supervision, and continuing professional development, highlighting the need for explicit, contemporary, and inclusive ethical guidance to support culturally safe and affirming care
Accountability · Agency (philosophy) · Code (set theory) · Code of conduct · Ethical code · Focus (optics) · Professional Conduct · Work (physics) · Counseling Practices and Supervision · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8
Health disparities between genderqueer, transgender, and cisgender individuals
A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients
Risk and protective factors for suicidality among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) young people, from countries with a high global acceptance index (GAI), within the context of the socio‐ecological model
Systematic review and development of a comprehensive conceptualization of social gender affirmation for trans and gender diverse people
A qualitative analysis of queer strengths
Australian LGBTQ teachers, exclusionary spaces and points of interruption
A systematic review of identity management strategies for religious people who are sexually and gender diverse
Health Needs of Trans and Gender Diverse Adults in Australia
The Costs and Benefits of ‘Passing’
Cultural humility, knowledge, and identity salience when working with sexual and gender minority clients
Missteps in psychotherapy with transgender clients
Reflecting on Life Then and Now
Predictors of Psychological Well-being in Transgender and Gender Diverse Australians
A Qualitative Exploration of Trans Adults’ Experiences of Engaging with Health Professionals in Australia
Workplace wellbeing among LGBTQ+ Australians
I just want to move forward”
Multidimensional Facets of Cultural Competence
Better issues to focus on”
Working with LGBT individuals
Trans broken arm syndrome
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |