Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scale validation and latent profile identification of GenAI competence for pre-service second language teachers

Bibliographic Data

ID21332995
AuthorsHanwei Wu (0000-0002-3876-110X, Hunan Normal University), Yongliang Wang (0000-0002-4672-8481, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power), Gurpinder Singh Lalli (0000-0002-7493-4813, University of Wolverhampton)
Year2026
Volume64
Issue2
Pages1121-1150
Publication date2026-06-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-042X • E-ISSN: 1613-4141
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/iral-2024-0301
OpenAlexW4410604578
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited72

Pre-service second language (L2) teachers can benefit from Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), yet there is a lack of reliable instrument to evaluate their GenAI competence. To fill this void, two studies were conducted. Study 1 aimed to create a GenAI Competence Scale for Chinese Pre-service L2 Teachers. Based on exploratory factor analysis of 350 samples, a 21-item scale was developed with a three-factor structure: Awareness and Willingness, Knowledge and Application, and Social Responsibility. Confirmatory factor analysis of 358 samples verified the scale’s ideal model fit, along with its high validity (convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related), reliability, and cross-gender invariance. Study 2 utilized Latent Profile Analysis to identify three distinct profiles among 708 Chinese pre-service L2 teachers’ GenAI competence: (i) moderate levels of Awareness and Willingness, relatively low Knowledge and Application, and moderate Social Responsibility (C1: 22.74 %), (ii) moderately high levels of Awareness and Willingness, relatively low Knowledge and Application, and moderately high Social Responsibility (C2: 65.82 %), and (iii) high levels of Awareness and Willingness, moderate Knowledge and Application, and high Social Responsibility (C3: 11.44 %). We anticipate that future scholars will adopt this scale across diverse L2 education settings, conducting some in-depth explorations to enhance the generalizability of findings, deepen the understanding of GenAI competence among pre-service educators, and contribute to the advancement of relevant theoretical frameworks and practical applications

Cartography · Competence (human resources) · Geography · Identification (biology) · Scale (ratio) · Child Development and Digital Technology · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · Gender and Technology in Education · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Threat or opportunity? Challenge vs hindrance appraisals of generative AI and self-regulated teaching among pre-service EFL teachers

    Open Access•Fen Liu, Hanwei Wu et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Bridging language teachers’ AI literacy and AI-induced emotions

    Open Access•Xiao Xie, Long Jiang Zhang et al.•Language Teaching Research•2026

  • Language Attitude and GenAI Attitude of Struggling EFL Learners

    Open Access•Siyi Wang, Yongxiang Wang•European Journal of Education•2025

  • Assessing teachers’ AI literacy

    Open Access•Mohammed Afandi Zainal, Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • ‘AI is like fire’

    Alba Paz-López, Liudmila Shafirova et al.•Journal of Education for Teaching…•2026

  • Beyond the Digital Divide

    Open Access•Hanwei Wu, Hai-Hua Wu et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • The role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in EFL teachers' passion for self-directed professional development

    Open Access•Na Sun, Yihan Sun•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Navigating anxiety in digital learning

    Open Access•Zhihui Ding, Weijiang Xue et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis

    Donna Harrington•Confirmatory factor analysis•2008

  • Measurement in Medicine

    Open Access•Henrica C W de Vet, Caroline B Terwee et al.•Measurement in Medicine•2011

  • Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (Getamel) by analysing commonly used external factors

    Open Access•Fazil Abdullah, Rupert Ward•Computers in Human Behavior•2016

  • Towards Innovative Research Approaches to Investigating the Role of Emotional Variables in Promoting Language Teachers’ and Learners’ Mental Health

    Open Access•Ali Derakhshan, Yongliang Wang et al.•International Journal of Mental…•2023

  • Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna

    Open Access•Carme Viladrich, Ariadna Angulo-Brunet et al.•Anales de Psicología•2017

  • Empowering educators to be AI-ready

    Open Access•Rose Luckin, Mutlu Cukurova et al.•Computers and Education:…•2022

  • Artificial intelligence self-efficacy

    Open Access•Yuyin Wang, Yu-Yin Wang et al.•Education and Information…•2024

  • To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing

    Open Access•Kai Guo, Deliang Wang•Education and Information…•2024

  • ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning

    Open Access•Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse et al.•RELC Journal•2023

  • “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”

    Open Access•Mark Feng Teng•Computers and Education:…•2024

  • A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis

    Open Access•Robert A Peterson•Marketing Letters•2000

  • Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation

    Open Access•Stella Timotheou, Ourania Miliou et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them

    Open Access•Thomas K F Chiu, Zubair Ahmad et al.•Computers and Education Open•2024

  • Performance of Factor Mixture Models as a Function of Model Size, Covariate Effects, and Class-Specific Parameters

    Gitta H Lubke, Gitta Lubke et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

    Gordon W Cheung, Roger B Rensvold•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2002

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.

    Leandre R Fabrigar, Duane T Wegener et al.•Psychological Methods•1999

  • A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1

    Open Access•C H Lawshe•Personnel Psychology•1975

  • The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning

    Hui-Chin Yeh, Hui‐Chin Yeh•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Unveiling the tapestry of teacher belief research

    Open Access•Xiaochen Wang, Y Gao et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2023

  • The role of teacher beliefs in teacher learning and practice

    Open Access•Martha I Martinez, Guadalupe Díaz et al.•Language and Education•2025

  • Evolution of English language education policies in the Chinese mainland in the 21st century

    Open Access•Huiyu Zhang, Yayu Shi•Linguistics and Education•2023

  • Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement

    Open Access•Yongliang Wang, Lina Xue•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Unleashing pre-service language teachers’ productivity with generative AI

    Open Access•Hubin Yin, Chan Wang et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • The influence of ChatGPT on thinking skills and creativity of EFL student teachers

    Galip Kartal•Journal of Education for Teaching…•2024

  • Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education

    Y Gao, Qikai Wang et al.•Asia Pacific Journal of Education•2024

  • What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q‐Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in GenAI ‐Supported Second Language Education

    Open Access•Ran Zhi, Ziwen Pan•European Journal of Education•2025

  • What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model

    Open Access•Dayou Chen, Wentao Liu et al.•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Validating the AI-assisted second language (L2) learning attitude scale for Chinese college students and its correlation with L2 proficiency

    Open Access•Hanwei Wu, Ran Zhi et al.•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Research Notes

    J F McKenzie, Martin L Wood et al.•American Journal of Health Behavior•1999

  • Evaluating Factor Analysis Decisions for Scale Design in Communication Research

    John T Morrison•Communication Methods and Measures•2009

  • Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting

    Serena Carpenter•Communication Methods and Measures•2017

  • Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research

    Open Access•P Mishra, Nicole Oster et al.•TechTrends•2024

  • Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research‐active EFL teachers’ perceptions

    Open Access•Ali Derakhshan, Farhad Ghiasvand•International Journal of Applied…•2024

  • Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence

    Open Access•Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Yuwei Wan et al.•System•2024

  • The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education

    Open Access•Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Lucas Kohnke•System•2024

  • Engagement and willingness to communicate in the L2 classroom

    Yongliang Wang, Hanwei Wu et al.•Journal of Multilingual and…•2025

  • Response Rates in National Panel Surveys

    Open Access•Robert F Schoeni, Frank Stafford et al.•The Annals of the American…•2013

  • Scale Development Research

    Open Access•Roger L Worthington, Tiffany A Whittaker•The Counseling Psychologist•2006

  • Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures

    Peter M Bentler, Douglas G Bonett•Psychological Bulletin•1980

Unique citing works8
Citations per year8
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae