Scale validation and latent profile identification of GenAI competence for pre-service second language teachers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21332995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hanwei Wu (0000-0002-3876-110X, Hunan Normal University), Yongliang Wang (0000-0002-4672-8481, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power), Gurpinder Singh Lalli (0000-0002-7493-4813, University of Wolverhampton) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1121-1150 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-042X • E-ISSN: 1613-4141 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/iral-2024-0301 |
| OpenAlex | W4410604578 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 72 |
Pre-service second language (L2) teachers can benefit from Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), yet there is a lack of reliable instrument to evaluate their GenAI competence. To fill this void, two studies were conducted. Study 1 aimed to create a GenAI Competence Scale for Chinese Pre-service L2 Teachers. Based on exploratory factor analysis of 350 samples, a 21-item scale was developed with a three-factor structure: Awareness and Willingness, Knowledge and Application, and Social Responsibility. Confirmatory factor analysis of 358 samples verified the scale’s ideal model fit, along with its high validity (convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related), reliability, and cross-gender invariance. Study 2 utilized Latent Profile Analysis to identify three distinct profiles among 708 Chinese pre-service L2 teachers’ GenAI competence: (i) moderate levels of Awareness and Willingness, relatively low Knowledge and Application, and moderate Social Responsibility (C1: 22.74 %), (ii) moderately high levels of Awareness and Willingness, relatively low Knowledge and Application, and moderately high Social Responsibility (C2: 65.82 %), and (iii) high levels of Awareness and Willingness, moderate Knowledge and Application, and high Social Responsibility (C3: 11.44 %). We anticipate that future scholars will adopt this scale across diverse L2 education settings, conducting some in-depth explorations to enhance the generalizability of findings, deepen the understanding of GenAI competence among pre-service educators, and contribute to the advancement of relevant theoretical frameworks and practical applications
Cartography · Competence (human resources) · Geography · Identification (biology) · Scale (ratio) · Child Development and Digital Technology · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · Gender and Technology in Education · Psychology · Social Psychology
Threat or opportunity? Challenge vs hindrance appraisals of generative AI and self-regulated teaching among pre-service EFL teachers
Bridging language teachers’ AI literacy and AI-induced emotions
Language Attitude and GenAI Attitude of Struggling EFL Learners
Assessing teachers’ AI literacy
‘AI is like fire’
Beyond the Digital Divide
The role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in EFL teachers' passion for self-directed professional development
Navigating anxiety in digital learning
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Measurement in Medicine
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (Getamel) by analysing commonly used external factors
Towards Innovative Research Approaches to Investigating the Role of Emotional Variables in Promoting Language Teachers’ and Learners’ Mental Health
Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna
Empowering educators to be AI-ready
Artificial intelligence self-efficacy
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
“ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”
A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation
What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them
Performance of Factor Mixture Models as a Function of Model Size, Covariate Effects, and Class-Specific Parameters
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1
The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning
Unveiling the tapestry of teacher belief research
Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world
The role of teacher beliefs in teacher learning and practice
Evolution of English language education policies in the Chinese mainland in the 21st century
Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement
Unleashing pre-service language teachers’ productivity with generative AI
The influence of ChatGPT on thinking skills and creativity of EFL student teachers
Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education
What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q‐Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in GenAI ‐Supported Second Language Education
What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model
Validating the AI-assisted second language (L2) learning attitude scale for Chinese college students and its correlation with L2 proficiency
Research Notes
Evaluating Factor Analysis Decisions for Scale Design in Communication Research
Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting
Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research
Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research‐active EFL teachers’ perceptions
Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence
The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education
Engagement and willingness to communicate in the L2 classroom
Response Rates in National Panel Surveys
Scale Development Research
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |