Bhāviveka’s Criticism of the Mīmāṃsaka in the Prajñāpradīpa
The Differences between the Chinese and the Tibetan Translations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21333600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Masaki Tamura (日本学術振興会特別研究員PD,博士(文学), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 891-886 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | 印度學佛教學研究 (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-4344 • E-ISSN: 1884-0051 |
| Publisher | Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.69.2_891 |
| OpenAlex | W3198359846 |
| Language | LV |
| References cited | 5 |
In the twenty-second chapter of the Prajñāpradīpa, which was translated into Chinese by Prabhākaramitra and into Tibetan by Klu’i rgyal mtshan, Bhāviveka, a Mādhyamika philosopher, criticizes the Mīmāṃsaka in a context where he makes a ‘‘digression’’ on the Tathāgata’s omniscience. In the beginning, Bhāviveka introduces a syllogism by which the Mīmāṃsaka tries to reject the Buddhist view of omniscience. Bhāviveka’s counter-argument differs in, respectively, the Chinese and the Tibetan translations. However, previous studies have studied only one of these translations
Argument (complex analysis) · Buddhism · Context (archaeology) · Omniscience · Theology · Chemistry · Chinese history and philosophy · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|