Six-Category Systems in the Early Vaiśeṣika School
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21333994 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Watanabe (0000-0001-6500-2101, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 950-946 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | 印度學佛教學研究 (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-4344 • E-ISSN: 1884-0051 |
| Publisher | Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.72.2_950 |
| OpenAlex | W4402254872 |
| Language | EN |
The great Vaiśeṣika philosopher Praśastapāda classified existence into six categories in his Padārthadharmasaṃgraha (PDhS). These six are: substance, quality, action, universal, particularity, and inherence. On the other hand, the classification in the earliest Vaiśeṣika text, the Vaiśeṣikasūtra (VS), is more obscure. In this paper, I examine information in texts in the Chinese Buddhist canon, and clarify two variations of the six-category system in the early Vaiśeṣika school. The first type, which I call the “Xuanzang type,” encompasses substance, quality, action, being, particular universality, and inherence. This type seems older than the other six-category system type in India, but was probably introduced into China later by Xuanzang and his disciples. The second type is the “PDhS type,” which follows the same six-category system as that in PDhS. This type gradually became standard in India; however, in China, the delayed introduction of the Xuanzang type overshadowed the PDhS type, and Chinese Buddhism soon forgot the latter
Geography · Chinese history and philosophy · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|