Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Six-Category Systems in the Early Vaiśeṣika School

Bibliographic Data

ID21333994
AuthorsM Watanabe (0000-0001-6500-2101, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume72
Issue2
Pages950-946
Publication date2024-03-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
Venue印度學佛教學研究 (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-4344 • E-ISSN: 1884-0051
PublisherJapanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4259/ibk.72.2_950
OpenAlexW4402254872
LanguageEN

The great Vaiśeṣika philosopher Praśastapāda classified existence into six categories in his Padārthadharmasaṃgraha (PDhS). These six are: substance, quality, action, universal, particularity, and inherence. On the other hand, the classification in the earliest Vaiśeṣika text, the Vaiśeṣikasūtra (VS), is more obscure. In this paper, I examine information in texts in the Chinese Buddhist canon, and clarify two variations of the six-category system in the early Vaiśeṣika school. The first type, which I call the “Xuanzang type,” encompasses substance, quality, action, being, particular universality, and inherence. This type seems older than the other six-category system type in India, but was probably introduced into China later by Xuanzang and his disciples. The second type is the “PDhS type,” which follows the same six-category system as that in PDhS. This type gradually became standard in India; however, in China, the delayed introduction of the Xuanzang type overshadowed the PDhS type, and Chinese Buddhism soon forgot the latter

Geography · Chinese history and philosophy · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Psychology

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae