Publishing robots
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21335546 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nicholas Hadsell (0000-0002-9727-0124, Baylor University, autor correspondente), Rich Eva (0000-0002-1661-060X, Duke University), Kyle Huitt (Baylor University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Páginas | 1-27 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-02-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2025.2460764 |
| OpenAlex | W4407370395 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
If AI can write an excellent philosophy paper, we argue that philosophy journals should strongly consider publishing that paper. After all, AI stands to make significant contributions to ongoing projects in some subfields, and it benefits the world of philosophy for those contributions to be published in journals, the primary purpose of which is to disseminate significant contributions to philosophy. We also propose the Sponsorship Model of AI journal to mitigate any costs associated with our view. This model requires at least one human to sponsor any AI manuscript submitted to a journal. After making this case, we evaluate a variety of objections – that our proposal will crash the academic job market, disincentivize humans from doing philosophy, and violate a variety of justified publishing norms – and conclude that they are all wanting
Business · Political science · Publishing · Law · Optimization and Search Problems · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers
The Belief Norm of Academic Publishing
Moral Uncertainty and Our Relationships with Unknown Minds
Creating a large language model of a philosopher
Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
ChatGPT is bullshit
The Philosophical Case for Robot Friendship
In Defense of Transracialism
Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |