Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The problem of uptake

Bibliographic Data

ID21335629
AuthorsJoel de Lara (0000-0003-3227-6725, Georgetown University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume67
Issue10
Pages3893-3929
Publication date2024-11-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0020174x.2022.2074880
OpenAlexW4281288215
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited25

To perform an illocutionary act – e.g. to apologise – is it necessary, sufficient, or irrelevant that a hearer understand you to be performing that act? This issue is sometimes called the ‘problem of uptake’. Famously, Austin’s inaugural account makes uptake necessary for illocutionary force. For decades, critics have objected to this view: Some have sought to show that uptake is irrelevant; others have argued that uptake is important though not essential; while still others have argued that uptake is necessary though must be radically reframed. Nevertheless, it is widely agreed that there is a problem of uptake in Austin. In this paper, I contend that this view is wrong. Austinian uptake, I argue, is essential; yet, contra the standard reading, it is not synonymous with understanding. Uptake is a narrow criterion pertaining to conventional-linguistic competencies, which rules out specific kinds of misunderstanding, not misunderstanding überhaupt. The importation of non-Austinian assumptions about uptake from subsequent speech act theorists – specifically, the mis-equivocation of uptake with understanding a speaker’s intention – I show, has muddied the water. This paper offers a novel reconsideration and salvaging of uptake and its significance, whose stakes I elucidate through intervention in the fraught issue of conceptualising sexual consent

Epistemology · Equivocation · Linguistics · Reading (process) · Sociology · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Philosophy · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

  • Bending as Counterspeech

    Open Access•Laura Caponetto, Bianca Cepollaro•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2023

  • ‘Austin vs. Searle on locutionary and illocutionary acts

    Open Access•Indrek Reiland•Inquiry•2024

  • Heard but not received

    Open Access•Grace Paterson•Inquiry•2023

  • Unfinished speech acts

    Open Access•Claudia Bianchi•Synthese•2024

  • Silencing Speech

    Open Access•Ishani Maitra•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2009

  • How To Do Things With Words

    J L Austin, John Austin•How to do things with words•1975

  • Pornography and Sexist Attitudes Among Heterosexuals

    Open Access•Gert Martin Hald, Neil N Malamuth et al.•Journal of Communication•2013

  • A Plea for Excuses

    J L Austin, J O Urmson et al.•Philosophical papers.•1979

  • Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton

    Open Access•R D Jacobson, Daniel Jacobson•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1995

  • The Vulnerability of the Ordinary

    Sandra Laugier, Wayne Wapeemukwa•Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal•2018

  • Meaning

    H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts

    John R Searle•The Philosophical Review•1968

  • Intention and Convention in Speech Acts

    P F Strawson•The Philosophical Review•1964

  • Meaning and Force

    Robert M Harnish, François Recanati•The Philosophical Review•1991

  • Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts

    Quentin Skinner•The Philosophical Quarterly•1970

  • Foundations of speech act theory

    Open Access•Katarzyna Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M Jaszczolt•Journal of Pragmatics•1996

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae