Troubles for alethic indeterminacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21335682 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bradley Armour‐garb (0000-0002-1351-3230, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 454-462 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2021.1932166 |
| OpenAlex | W3168571250 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
In ‘Alethic undecidability and alethic indeterminacy’, Jay Newhard (2020 Newhard, J. 2020. Alethic undecidability and alethic indeterminacy. Synthese online publication (not yet assigned to an issue, but available online).[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) proposes what he calls an ‘alethic indeterminacy’ approach to the semantic paradoxes. In this paper, I explore his proposed approach. What I will show is that Newhard’s response to the paradoxes cannot be sustained. If I am right about this, then this spells the end for his type of approach
Epistemology · Indeterminacy (philosophy) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |