An inexplicably good argument for causal finitism

Causal finitism, the view that the causal history of any event must be finite, has garnered much philosophical interest recently—especially because of its applicability to the Kalām cosmological argument. The most prominent argument for causal finitism is the Grim Reaper argument, which attempts to show that, if infinite causal histories are possible, then other paradoxical states of affairs must also be possible. However, this style of argument has been criticized on the grounds of (i) relying on controversial modal principles, and (ii) providing a false diagnosis of the paradoxes involved. In this paper, I develop a new kind of Grim Reaper argument immune to these criticisms. I show that, by using insights from the literature on time travel, causal finitists should instead argue that infinite causal histories are problematically inexplicable , as they entail the possibility of unexplained foiling mechanisms. The fruits of this paper are that (i) a novel supporting argument for the Kalām is developed, and (ii) along the way of building this argument, it is shown that the literatures on time travel and causal finitism are deeply and intimately connected

Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Ontological argument · Philosophy of religion · Medicine · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

• Against the standard solution to the grandfather paradox

  Open Access•Yael Loewenstein•Synthese•2022

  Add to list

• The Form of the Benardete Dichotomy

  Nicholas Shackel•The British Journal for the…•2005

  Add to list