Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Wittgenstein’s philosophical anti-scientism allow for supernaturalism

Bibliographic Data

ID21336241
AuthorsAleksei Rakhmanin (0000-0002-9677-9244), Aleksei Yuryevich Rakhmanin (University of Helsinki, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume99
Issue2
Publication date2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7047 • E-ISSN: 1572-8684
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11153-026-10000-0
OpenAlexW7143437078
LanguageEN
References cited20

While in recent decades there have been interpretations of Wittgenstein’s philosophy as naturalistic, this possibility has not yet been fully explored in the philosophy of religion. The main obstacle to this seems to be twofold. First, it is often claimed that Wittgenstein’s philosophy was anti-scientistic in spirit (and thus cannot be naturalistic by definition) and, second, his views on religion left room for supernaturalist claims. I argue that Wittgenstein’s philosophy is naturalistic precisely because of its anti-scientistic underpinnings, which stem from the idea of the autonomy of philosophical practice. On this basis, I show that Wittgenstein’s allegedly acknowledging the supernatural content of religious utterances does not lead him to incorporate this content into his philosophical practice. Moreover, in the light of his anti-scientism, the established distinction between cognitivist and non-cognitivist approaches to religion might be reconsidered. Based on Wittgenstein’s anti-scientism, I show that although his philosophy of religion may be characterized as cognitivist, it still does not allow for supernaturalism. In the end, I demonstrate how Wittgenstein’s combination of anti-scientism and non-supernaturalism can contribute to rethinking methodological naturalism in philosophy of religion

Autonomy · Content (measure theory) · Modern philosophy · Naturalism · Philosophical methodology · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of religion · Philosophy of science · Western philosophy · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications

  • The Big Typescript TS 213

    Open Access•C Grant Luckhardt, Maximilian E Aue et al.•The Big Typescript TS 213•2005

  • Cognitivism about religious belief in later Wittgenstein

    Open Access•Alois Pichler, Sebastian Sunday Grève•International Journal for…•2025

  • ‘Everybody would agree’ – a novel Wittgensteinian approach to philosophy of religion

    Open Access•Hermen Kroesbergen•International Journal for…•2022

  • Between knowledge and certainty

    Open Access•David Ellis•International Journal for…•2025

  • Prolegomena to a Buddhist philosophy of religion

    Open Access•Rafal K Stepien•International Journal for…•2023

  • Approaches to philosophy of religion

    Open Access•Mikel Burley•Religious Studies•2015

  • For If There Is No Resurrection of the Dead, Then Christ Has Not Been Raised Either

    Open Access•Alois Pichler•Religions•2025

  • Sheer Poison? Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Religion

    Open Access•Duncan Richter•Religions•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae