Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self‐stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress

Bibliographic Data

ID21337189
AuthorsBen C Winestone (0009-0003-5904-3523, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood VIC Australia, corresponding author), Glenn Melvin (0000-0002-6958-3908, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood VIC Australia), Glenn A Melvin (School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood VIC Australia), Ruth Tatnell (0000-0001-6068-9864, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood VIC Australia), Hallford D J (0000-0003-1093-8345, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood VIC Australia)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue6
Pages1347-1352
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7594 • E-ISSN: 1464-066X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ijop.13256
PMID39396523
OpenAlexW4403368890
LanguageEN
References cited19

The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide‐related self‐stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants ( N = 661, M age = 34.9, SD = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd‐sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS‐21. State mood did not change from pre‐ to post‐suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, t (662) = −.16, p = .868, d = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self‐stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, F (9,643) = 1.16, p = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, t = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, t = −1.76, p = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self‐stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress

Context (archaeology) · Coping (psychology) · Distress · Medical emergency · Mood · Poison control · Psychiatry · Suicidal ideation · Suicide prevention · Clinical Psychology · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

  • The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale ( Sidas )

    Open Access•Bregje van Spijker, Bregje A J van Spijker et al.•Suicide and Life-Threatening…•2014

  • Stigma and Help Seeking for Mental Health Among College Students

    Open Access•Dan Eisenberg, Daniel Eisenberg et al.•Medical Care Research and Review•2009

  • Evaluating Iatrogenic Risk of Youth Suicide Screening Programs

    Madelyn S Gould, Frank Marrocco et al.•JAMA•2005

  • The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (Dass‐21)

    Open Access•Julie D Henry, John R Crawford•British Journal of Clinical…•2005

  • You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long

    Charles S Carver•International Journal of…•1997

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae