The 1911 Revolution and the Frontier
The 'Political Game' and 'State-Building' in Outer Mongolia during the 1911 Revolution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2133871 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Feng Jianyong, Feng Jian-yong, Joseph W Esherick, C X George Wei |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Japan focus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1557-4660 • E-ISSN: 1557-4660 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1557466014017021 |
| OpenAlex | W4408534103 |
| Language | EN |
Frontier studies have long been a sensitive area for historical research in the PRC, largely because of the demands for increasing autonomy in Tibet and Xinjiang-movements that are regarded as "separatist" by the authorities. This sensitivity makes the study of the 1911 Revolution on the frontier particularly difficult, because it was precisely in 1911 that independence movements manifested themselves in Tibet and Mongolia. Both of these regions had been incorporated into the Qing empire, whose emperors acted as patrons of the Tibetan Buddhism revered by Tibetans and Mongols alike. In Mongolia, the Qing court confirmed the status of Mongols nobles, and intermarried with the families of Mongol princes. But the 1911 Revolution created a secular republic, which made these religious and feudal ties difficult to maintain. More importantly, the revolution was launched with an overtly Han nationalist agenda to "expel the northern barbarians, restore China" that left little political space for the political aspirations of other nationalities. As a result, both Tibet and Outer Mongolia declared independence after the Wuchang Uprising
Ancient history · Archaeology · China · Frontier · Inner mongolia · Political science · Politics · State-building · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · History · Law · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Soviet and Russian History
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |