Their Cross Problem and Ours

Contemporary Christian witness about the death of Jesus moves in a culture already saturated with an aesthetic or intuitive ethic of the crucifixion. That aesthetic has many features acquired though Christianity’s long social dominance. This essay focuses on one aspect, authentically derived from the distinctive understanding Christian faith attributed to the crucifixion. First, I describe the Roman context, and the natural “reading” of the image of a crucified person there, as the background to considering the absence of that image in early Christianity. This leads to exploration of the ways that early Christianity used a variety of typological images to weave a new frame of meaning around the crucifixion of Christ. Then, using Tom Holland’s recent historical synopsis of Christianity, I indicate how this new aesthetic of the cross lodged itself in shared cultural assumptions and perceptions. Finally, I consider the crucial American case of lynching, in which White Christian churches betrayed this distinctive meaning of the crucifixion, Black churches affirmed it, and the cultural aesthetic of crucifixion proved itself a key medium for resistance to lynching. Finally, I suggest some implications for church preaching and teaching in relation to the surrounding culture today

Aesthetics · Art · Christianity · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential) · New Testament · Relation (database) · Theology · Witness · History · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions

• The Christian Aesthetics of Trauma

  Julie Grandjean, Mark A Gring•Visual Communication Quarterly•2026

  Add to list