The Reception of Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) in Ibrāhīm al-Kūrānī’s (d. 1101/1690) Works
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21340049 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naser Dumairieh (Ibn Haldun University Istanbul Türkiye, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 249-275 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Der Islam (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-1818 • E-ISSN: 1613-0928 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/islam-2025-0008 |
| OpenAlex | W4409124458 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Mullā Ibrāhīm al-Kūrānī (d. 1101/1690) was an Ashʿarī scholar who was heavily influenced by the Ṣufī ideas of Ibn ʿArabī (d. 638/1240). Nevertheless, he has been described in much of 20th-century Arabic literature as a Salafī scholar and a defender of Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328). Western academic studies have also described him as the scholar who rehabilitated, or at least played a crucial role in rehabilitating, Ibn Taymiyya and the Ḥanbalī school of thought. How did an Akbarian and Ashʿarī scholar come to be known as a Salafī and a defender of Ibn Taymiyya, who famously declared Ibn ʿArabī an unbeliever? Why was al-Kūrānī labeled a Salafī and what influence did Ibn Taymiyya have on al-Kūrānī’s works? In this paper, I examine the reception of Ibn Taymiyya in al-Kūrānī’s works and argue that al-Kūrānī’s interest in and knowledge of Ibn Taymiyya’s works was limited to a single idea related to understanding ambiguous Qurʾānic verses ( mutashābihāt ) that served his Ṣufī project, without displaying any genuine interest in Ibn Taymiyya or his thought more generally
Traditional medicine · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Medicine · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |