Covid-19 vaccine anxieties
Exploring social and political drivers of vaccine attitudes in Kono District, Sierra Leone
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21342672 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Liza J Malcolm (College of Charleston), Kristen E Mclean (0000-0002-3733-6953, College of Charleston, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 179-194 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Biosocial Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0021-9320 • E-ISSN: 1469-7599 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021932024000373 |
| PMID | 39773779 |
| OpenAlex | W4406184442 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 38 |
As COVID-19 spread rapidly during the early months of the pandemic, many communities around the globe anxiously waited for a vaccine. At the start of the pandemic, it was widely believed that Africa would be a significant source of infection, and thus, vaccinating African communities became a primary goal among local and global health authorities. However, when the COVID-19 vaccine became available in March 2021 in Sierra Leone, many people viewed it with scepticism and hesitation. While much literature has focused on access and distribution-related challenges for vaccination in the region, a growing number of studies discuss vaccine hesitancy as driving low vaccine uptake. Shifting attention to understanding the determinants of vaccine hesitancy remains fundamental to increasing vaccination rates, as negative vaccine perceptions tend to delay or prevent vaccination. This study sought to do this by assessing, through semi-structured qualitative interviews, vaccine-related attitudes and experiences of residents of Sierra Leone’s Kono District. In contrast to studies that utilise “knowledge-deficit” models of belief, however, this study drew upon the vaccine anxieties framework (Leach and Fairhead, 2007), which views vaccines as being imbued with personal, historical, and political meaning. Findings suggest that important bodily, social, and political factors, including fear of side effects, the spread of misinformation prompted by poor messaging strategies, and distrust of government and international actors, influenced people’s COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and behaviours. It is hoped that the study’s findings will inform future policies and interventions related to vaccine uptake in Africa and globally
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Development economics · Disease · Distrust · Misinformation · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Psychological intervention · Sierra leone · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Vaccination · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Immunology · Medicine · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
What Led to the Nigerian Boycott of the Polio Vaccination Campaign?
Community-Centered Responses to Ebola in Urban Liberia
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in Africa
Transitioning the Covid-19 response in the WHO African region
Comparing social responses to Ebola and Covid-19 in Sierra Leone
‘Vaccines are for children only’? Some institutional roots of popular scepticism about vaccines for Covid-19 in Sierra Leone
Uncertainties beyond preparedness
Covid-19 in Ebola’s Wake
Determinants of Covid-19 vaccine readiness and hesitancy among adults in sub-Saharan Africa
Delays in childhood immunization in a conflict area
Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model
Controversial Ebola vaccine trials in Ghana
Power, fairness and trust
The impact of information sources on Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in sub-Saharan Africa
We Know Who is Eating the Ebola Money
More than Disease
Vaccine anxieties, vaccine preparedness
We are the heroes because we are ready to die for this country
Ebola lessons
International Political Economy and the 2014 West African Ebola Outbreak
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |