Nothing But Stereotypes? Negligible Sex Differences Across Creativity Measures in Science, Arts, and Sports Adolescent High Achievers
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21345455 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vlada Repeykova (0000-0001-9718-3103, National Research Tomsk State University), Teemu Toivainen (0000-0002-8770-3635, Goldsmiths University of London), Maxim Likhanov (0000-0001-6003-741X, Beijing Normal University), Kim van Broekhoven (0000-0002-1618-3345, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Yulia Kovas (0000-0001-9633-6374, Goldsmiths University of London, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 58 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 47-65 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Creative Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-0175 • E-ISSN: 2162-6057 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jocb.623 |
| OpenAlex | W4388991106 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 106 |
Previous research has focused on understanding when, why, and how sex differences in creativity occur, as results vary across samples, measures, and methodologies. In the current study we investigated sex differences in creativity among 984 high achieving adolescents in three expertise areas: Sciences, Arts, and Sports. Eight creativity indicators were analyzed: Alternative uses task (AUT) fluency; creative self‐efficacy (CSE); intraindividual strengths (difference between CSE and AUT Fluency); five self‐reported creativity scales: Self/everyday, scholarly, performance, mechanical/scientific, artistic. The results showed negligible sex differences ( = .01), with females performing better in AUT Fluency and males self‐rating their CSE higher. No sex differences were found in self/everyday, scholarly and performance creativity. Males self‐rated their mechanical/scientific creativity ( = .06) higher than females; while females self‐rated their artistic creativity ( = .02) higher in comparison to males. Our results extend the existing literature by finding negligible sex differences in adolescent expert groups. However, some stereotypical differences emerged, for example, females with Sciences expertise rated their mechanical/scientific creativity lower than males with and even without Sciences expertise. Results call for further investigation into the links between sex differences, expertise, and specific creativity domains
Art · Creativity · Developmental psychology · Fluency · Mathematics education · Task (project management) · The arts · Visual arts · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance
Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior
Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management
Creative Self-Efficacy
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
Big Five Personality Traits as the Predictors of Creative Self‐Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire
Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as Predictors of Personal and Public Achievement
Counting the muses
The relationship between intelligence and creativity
Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research
In Praise of Convergent Thinking
Robust statistical methods
The Standard Definition of Creativity
The Psychology of Sex Differences
Gender differences in creative potential
Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale
Personality and engagement with music
The Relationship of Creativity Measures to School Achievement and to Preferred Learning and Thinking Style in a Sample of Korean High School Students
The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning
Does Women's Preference for Highbrow Leisure Begin in the Family? Comparing Leisure Participation among Brothers and Sisters
The Variability Hypothesis
Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process
Individual differences in cognition
Creative expressiveness in childhood writing predicts educational achievement beyond motivation and intelligence
Ordinary extraordinary
Explaining the Gender Gap in Math Test Scores
Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success
Why Do People Overestimate or Underestimate Their Abilities? A Cross-Culturally Valid Model of Cognitive and Motivational Processes in Self-Assessment Biases
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |