Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Covid-normal workplaces

Should working from home be a ‘collective flexibility’

Bibliographic Data

ID21349223
AuthorsSue Williamson (0000-0001-9061-7466, UNSW Canberra, corresponding author), Alicia Pearce (UTS Law, Australia)
Year2022
Volume64
Issue3
Pages461-473
Publication date2022-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1856 • E-ISSN: 1472-9296
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00221856221094894
OpenAlexW4224865990
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited16

Working from home expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This Controversy examines how working from home was framed and regulated pre-pandemic. We contrast this with the changes made to Australia's industrial award system during the pandemic to increase flexibilities around working from home, in response to a collective need for a responsive safety net. We argue that the conception and regulation of working from home is shifting from an individual flexibility, to a ‘collective flexibility’ available to a wide array of workers, collectively negotiated and governed by increased regulation. While industrial instruments were varied to accommodate public health requirements and the need of organisations and employees to work from home, these shifts were temporary. We argue that working from home provisions should rightly be regulated as a collective entitlement. We therefore consider possible ways forward in regulating this form of working, drawing from international developments. We raise these issues to extend debates around how working from home can be regulated to benefit employers and employees as we move towards COVID-normal

Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Economics · Entitlement (fair division) · Flexibility (engineering) · Management · Pandemic · Political science · Public relations · Work (physics) · Working time · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Medicine

  • The autonomy paradox, working from home and psychosocial hazards

    Open Access•Alexis Vassiley, Azadeh Shafaei et al.•Journal of Industrial Relations•2025

  • Australia's right to disconnect from work

    Open Access•Emmanuel Josserand, Martijn Boersma•Journal of Industrial Relations•2024

  • Flexible work patterns and experiences of the work-family interface among Australian parents

    Open Access•Stacey Hokke, Simon J Mason et al.•Journal of Industrial Relations•2024

  • Perception of the Effects of Working from Home on Isolation and Stress by Spanish Workers during Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Jorge De Andrés-Sánchez, Ángel Belzunegui-Eraso et al.•Social Sciences•2023

  • The future of working from home in the public sector

    Open Access•Sue Williamson, Alicia Pearce et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2022

  • Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis

    Open Access•Ángel Belzunegui-Eraso, Amaya Erro-Garcés•Sustainability•2020

  • Why Working from Home Will Stick

    José María Barrero, Nena Bloom et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2021

  • The Australian industrial system in the era of Covid-19

    Open Access•Michele O’Neil•Journal of Industrial Relations•2021

  • Working from home

    Open Access•Audronė Nakrošienė, Ilona Bučiūnienė et al.•International Journal of Manpower•2019

  • Will working from home become the ‘new normal’ in the public sector

    Open Access•Sue Williamson, L Colley et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2020

Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae