Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) D. Johnson , Lawrence D. Bobo
ANO 2004
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
ISSN 1742-058X
E-ISSN 1742-0598
EDITORA Elsevier (Netherlands)
DOI 10.1017/s1742058x04040081
CITAÇÕES 50
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 ef6d1c5486c2795117f4e0cfd29471fa

Resumo

It is commonly accepted that Black and White Americans hold divergent views about the criminal justice system. Furthermore, many accept the view that U.S. public opinion is unflinchingly punitive where issues of criminal justice policy are concerned, with this punitiveness among White Americans deriving to a significant degree from anti-Black prejudice. Using a series of survey-based experiments and large, nationally representative samples of White and African American respondents, we subject the questions of Black-White polarization, unyielding punitiveness, and the influence of racial prejudice to close scrutiny. Our results, first, confirm large Black-White differences in opinion with Blacks consistently less punitive than Whites. These differences are substantially a result of beliefs about the extent of racial bias in the criminal justice system. Second, the framing experiments suggest that responses to the death penalty are very different than responses to drug-related crimes like crack or powder cocaine use, with the former exhibiting far less malleability than the latter. Third, racial prejudice is a consistently large influence on White public opinion and a weaker, but sometimes important influence among Blacks as well. Implications for discourse on race and crime are also discussed.

Ferramentas