Comparativist Theories or Conspiracy Theories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21351673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Caitlin Jacobs (0000-0001-6903-0468, corresponding author), Journal Of Philosophy Inc |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 365-393 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-362X • E-ISSN: 1939-8549 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/jphil2024121728 |
| OpenAlex | W4401827718 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Although physical theories routinely posit absolute quantities, such as absolute position or intrinsic mass, it seems that only comparative quantities such as distance and mass ratio are observable. But even if there are in fact only distances and mass ratios, the success of absolutist theories means that the world looks just as if there are absolute positions and intrinsic masses. If comparativism is nevertheless true, there is a sense in which this is a cosmic conspiracy: the comparative quantities satisfy certain relations that only absolutism can explain. I show that such cosmic conspiracies are a pervasive feature of comparativist theories. The argument is structurally similar to the well-known No Miracles Argument for scientific realism. Just as anti-realism cannot explain the empirical adequacy of our theories in general, so comparativism cannot explain the empirical adequacy of absolutist theories in particular
Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |