Validity of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and PID-5-BF+M in Older Adults
A Study Across Two Languages and Countries
Dados Bibliográficos
This study evaluates the validity of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and PID-5-BF+M in older adults, focusing on (a) factor structure, (b) measurement invariance across languages and countries, and (c) nomological network. These tools assess personality functioning and maladaptive traits based on the hybrid/dimensional approaches of personality pathology. Two samples of adults aged 65 and older were recruited: a French-speaking Canadian sample (N = 452) and a Dutch-speaking Belgian sample (N = 415). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the two-factor model of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and the second-order factor structure of the PID-5-BF+M. Measurement invariance analyses indicated full configural invariance for both instruments. Metric and scalar invariance were partially supported for the LPFS-BF 2.0, while the PID-5-BF+M showed full metric but partial scalar invariance. Evaluation of the nomological net supported convergent validity of the LPFS-BF 2.0 with other measures of personality functioning, and revealed expected associations between the measures themselves and with well-being and maladaptive emotion regulation, alongside some seemingly age-specific nuances. These findings support the LPFS-BF 2.0 and PID-5-BF+M as valid tools for assessing personality pathology in older adults. However, partial invariance findings suggest caution when comparing scores across linguistic and cultural groups
Big Five personality traits · Confirmatory factor analysis · Convergent validity · Measurement invariance · Metric (unit) · Nomological network · Personality · Sample (material) · Mental Health Research Topics · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Personality Traits and Psychology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Constructing validity
Testing measurement invariance across groups
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Differentiation of Self and Interpersonal Functioning with the Level of Personality Functioning Scale – Brief Form 2.0
Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Norwegian Version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale – Brief Form 2.0 in a Large Clinical Sample
Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5– Brief Form Plus, Modified
Comparative Content Analysis of Self-Report Scales for Level of Personality Functioning
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Standard set of patient-reported outcomes for personality disorder
Measurement invariance conventions and reporting
A Meta‐Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the ICD ‐11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM ‐5–Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF+M)
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |