Configurational Approaches in Personality Assessment Research
An Introduction with Application to Rorschach Data
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21352366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Joubert (0000-0003-1348-4238, University of Ottawa, corresponding author), Ava Bowns (University of Ottawa) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-11 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality Assessment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3891 • E-ISSN: 1532-7752 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00223891.2026.2684429 |
| PMID | 42300473 |
| OpenAlex | W7164929746 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
This article introduces configurational comparative methods (CCMs), such as qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and coincidence analysis (CNA), as valuable tools for advancing personality assessment research. Unlike traditional variable-centered approaches, CCMs focus on configurations of indicators that are necessary or sufficient for specific outcomes, aligning more closely with clinical reasoning and idiographic case formulation. Drawing on principles like equifinality and multifinality, CCMs address the complexity and heterogeneity of psychological functioning, particularly in clinical populations. An empirical example using Rorschach and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) data from a sample of university students illustrates how CNA can identify distinct combinations of indicators linked to depressive symptomatology in college students. The analysis highlights interpretive asymmetries, showing that the presence of specific Rorschach markers yields clearer inferences than their absence. While CCMs involve challenges such as data calibration and model ambiguity, they offer a unique capacity to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings. As a complement to variable- and person-centered methods, configurational approaches may help assessment researchers formulate and test clinically interpretable hypotheses about patterns of indicators. The paper argues for greater adoption of these methods to better capture the complexity of personality and psychopathology
Complement (music) · Nomothetic and idiographic · Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Personality test · Psychometrics · Rorschach test · Sample (material) · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Person‐Centered Analysis
Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research
The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology
Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person-Specific Approaches
Network analysis
Complementary Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches to the Dimensionality of Psychometric Constructs
An Introduction to Latent Variable Mixture Modeling (Part 1)
Integrating Person‐Centered and Variable‐Centered Analyses
Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis.
The Comparative Method
An Introduction to Network Psychometrics
A developmental perspective on personality and psychopathology across the life span
The Mereology of Depression—Networks of Depressive Symptoms during the Course of Psychotherapy
Latent variable mixture models
The validity of individual Rorschach variables
Media Review
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Causal modeling with multi-value and fuzzy-set Coincidence Analysis
The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Qualitative research in counseling psychology
Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Highly cited | No |
|---|