Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Take Their Word for It

The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity

Bibliographic Data

ID21352459
AuthorsMatthew Holcomb (Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group), Sadie Pyne (Windsor Neuropsychology), Sadie R Pyne (Windsor Dermatology), Laura Cutler (0000-0002-9295-2484, University of Windsor), David A Oikle (Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group), László A Erdődi (0000-0003-0575-9991, University of Windsor, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume105
Issue4
Pages520-530
Publication date2023-07-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality Assessment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3891 • E-ISSN: 1532-7752
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00223891.2022.2114358
PMID36041087
OpenAlexW4293860271
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited107

This study was designed to compare the validity of the Inventory of Problems (IOP-29) and its newly developed memory module (IOP-M) in 150 patients clinically referred for neuropsychological assessment. Criterion groups were psychometrically derived based on established performance and symptom validity tests (PVTs and SVTs). The criterion-related validity of the IOP-29 was compared to that of the Negative Impression Management scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (NIMPAI) and the criterion-related validity of the IOP-M was compared to that of Trial-1 on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM-1). The IOP-29 correlated significantly more strongly (z = 2.50, p = .01) with criterion PVTs than the NIMPAI (rIOP-29 = .34; rNIM-PAI = .06), generating similar overall correct classification values (OCCIOP-29: 79–81%; OCCNIM-PAI: 71–79%). Similarly, the IOP-M correlated significantly more strongly (z = 2.26, p = .02) with criterion PVTs than the TOMM-1 (rIOP-M = .79; rTOMM-1 = .59), generating similar overall correct classification values (OCCIOP-M: 89–91%; OCCTOMM-1: 84–86%). Findings converge with the cumulative evidence that the IOP-29 and IOP-M are valuable additions to comprehensive neuropsychological batteries. Results also confirm that symptom and performance validity are distinct clinical constructs, and domain specificity should be considered while calibrating instruments

Cognition · Construct validity · Criterion validity · Malingering · Neuropsychology · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Test validity · Clinical Psychology · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Traumatic Brain Injury Research

  • The Inventory of Problems is sensitive and specific to experimentally induced malingering

    Open Access•Klency Gonzalez Hernandez, Randy Frankcis Perez Morales et al.•Psychiatry, Psychology and Law•2026

  • Two Views of Invalid Response Set and Malingering Attributions in Forensic Assessment

    Open Access•Gerald Young, László A Erdődi et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  • From “below chance” to “a single error is one too many”

    Open Access•László A Erdődi•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2023

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

  • Comparing correlated correlation coefficients

    Xiao-Li Meng, Robert Rosenthal et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae