Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Teaching and learning floating and sinking

A meta‐analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21353668
AutoresMartin Schwichow (0000-0001-9694-7183, Department of Physics and Physics Education University of Education Freiburg Freiburg Germany, autor de correspondencia), Anastasios Zoupidis (0000-0003-3097-9451, Department of Primary Level Education Democritus University of Thrace Alexandroupolis Greece)
Año2024
Volumen61
Número2
Páginas487-516
Fecha de publicación2024-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Research in Science Teaching (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-4308 • E-ISSN: 1098-2736
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/tea.21909
OpenAlexW4387575776
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas85

Floating and sinking (FS) is a key topic in science education, both at primary and secondary levels. The interpretation of FS phenomena, however, is challenging due to the difficulty of the scientific concepts and explanatory models involved (e.g., density, buoyancy), along with students' everyday experiences, which conflict with scientific explanations. Consequently, many studies over the last few decades have investigated how FS could be taught effectively to students of different ages while utilizing multiple teaching approaches. This meta‐analysis summarizes findings from 69 intervention studies on teaching FS conducted between 1977 and 2021. Over all studies, we estimated a mean effect size of g = 0.85 (95% CI = 0.71, 0.99). This large effect size demonstrates that, although FS is a challenging concept, teaching FS is effective even in elementary school. Moreover, in a moderator analysis, we investigate the effect of intervention characteristics, students' age, as well as study design, and assessment features on the mean study effect size. To analyze the effect of these moderator variables, we use a three‐level hierarchical meta‐regression model for dealing with multiple effect sizes from single studies. We found two intervention characteristics that explain variance in study effect sizes: longer lasting interventions result in larger effect sizes and interventions where hands‐on experiments are applied are more effective than those utilizing virtual experiments. Furthermore, studies with a treatment‐control group comparison have significantly smaller effect sizes than studies with a pre‐post design. We discuss the implications of our findings regarding the moderator variables for effective teaching of FS and further research on FS

Intervention (counseling) · Mathematics education · Meta-analysis · Moderation · Multilevel model · Multilevel modelling · Psychological intervention · Sample size determination · Science education · Statistics · Teaching method · Variance (accounting) · Animal and Plant Science Education · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Psychology

  • Effectiveness of climate change education—a meta-analysis

    Open Access•Vanessa Marie-Jane Aeschbach, Martin Schwichow et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Expanding STEM capital

    Open Access•Sabine Hasenhütl, Silke Luttenberger et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • The complexities of moving topics between disciplines

    Open Access•K Dunnett, Anders Mattias Lundmark•International Journal of Science…•2024

  • Effectiveness of a school scientific model to address buoyancy in the training of prospective early childhood teachers

    Marta Cruz-Guzmán, Antonio García‐Carmona•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Instructional sequences in science teaching

    Open Access•Zhang Lin, John Sweller•European Journal of Psychology of…•2024

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

    Julia H Littell, Jacqueline Corcoran et al.•Systematic Reviews and…•2008

  • Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

    Open Access•Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges et al.•Introduction to Meta-Analysis•2009

  • Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R

    Open Access•Mark Assink, Carlijn J M Wibbelink•The Quantitative Methods for…•2016

  • The nature of teachers' pedagogical content beliefs matters for students' achievement gains

    Fritz C Staub, Elsbeth Stern•Journal of Educational Psychology•2002

  • Detecting Selection Bias in Meta-Analyses with Multiple Outcomes

    Belén Fernández-Castilla, Belén Fernández‐Castilla et al.•The Journal of Experimental…•2021

  • Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?

    Richard E Mayer•American Psychologist•2004

  • Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis

    Open Access•Spyros Konstantopoulos•Research Synthesis Methods•2011

  • How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes

    Joseph A Durlak•Journal of Pediatric Psychology•2009

  • Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry

    Open Access•Maria Araceli Ruiz‐Primo, Erin M Furtak•Journal of Research in Science…•2007

  • Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate

    Open Access•Guido Knapp, Joachim Hartung•Statistics in Medicine•2003

  • Different Bodies, Different Minds

    Open Access•Daniel Casasanto•Current Directions in Psychological…•2011

  • Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes.

    Melissa A Rodgers, James E Pustejovsky•Psychological Methods•2021

  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Open Access•Matthias Egger, Gregory D Smith et al.•BMJ•1997

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work

    Paul A Kirschner, John Sweller et al.•Educational Psychologist•2006

  • Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

    Open Access•Wolfgang Viechtbauer•Journal of Statistical Software•2010

  • The effectiveness of 3D holographic technology on students’ learning performance

    Qing Yu, Baomin Li et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2022

  • Teaching for conceptual change in preschool science

    Miriam Leuchter, Henrik Saalbach et al.•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Effective instruction conditions for educational robotics to develop programming ability of K‐12 students

    Open Access•Lihui Sun, Danhua Zhou•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2023

  • Game‐based learning has good chemistry with chemistry education

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Hu, Timothy Gallagher et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2022

  • The Role of Alternative Theories and Anomalous Evidence in Children’s Scientific Belief Revision

    Open Access•Patricia A Ganea, Nicole E Larsen et al.•Child Development•2021

  • Teaching the control-of-variables strategy

    Open Access•Martin Schwichow, Steve Croker et al.•Developmental Review•2016

  • Children’s learning about water in a museum and in the classroom

    Open Access•Harriet R Tenenbaum, Harriet Tenenbaum et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2004

  • Two approaches to teaching young children science concepts, vocabulary, and scientific problem-solving skills

    Open Access•Soo Hong, Soo-Young Hong et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2011

  • Chance favours only the prepared mind

    Open Access•Christine Howes, Christine Howe et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2005

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año2,5
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2025 (2)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae