Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Characterizing conceptual understanding during design‐based learning

Analyzing students' design talk and drawings using the chemical thinking framework

Bibliographic Data

ID21353879
AuthorsHanna Stammes (0000-0001-7072-9401, Institute for Science Education Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands, corresponding author), Ineke Henze (0000-0003-0119-0451, Institute for Science Education Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands), Erik Barendsen (0000-0003-4684-4287, Institute for Science Education Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands), Marc J De Vries (0000-0002-1982-2157, Science Education and Communication Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands), Marc de Vries (Delft University of Technology)
Year2023
Volume60
Issue3
Pages643-674
Publication date2023-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Research in Science Teaching (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4308 • E-ISSN: 1098-2736
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/tea.21812
OpenAlexW4295249534
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited48

Design‐based learning is considered a powerful way to help students apply and develop understanding of science concepts, but research has shown that the success of this approach is not a given. Examining students' understanding of science concepts in various design‐based learning contexts has thus continued to be an important field of research. To help advance such work, we explored the affordances of a novel analytic approach for studying data gathered in design‐based learning classrooms. We used the “chemical thinking framework,” specifically its “conceptual sophistication” dimension, to analyze 10th‐grade, chemistry students' design talk and drawings. We gathered this data during small‐group design planning and drawing activities in the classrooms of two teachers whose students were designing a product that harnesses chemical energy to change the temperature of a beverage or snack. The findings demonstrate that this analytic approach was able to reveal that students (implicitly) drew on their understanding of several chemistry concepts while designing. Moreover, it showed that students could use everyday as well as more sophisticated understandings regarding a given chemistry concept while designing. This study furthermore unveiled differences in what and how students' design talk and drawings may reveal use of conceptual understanding, and it showed that different student teams may use a unique combination of understandings during design planning and drawing. We describe how this study's analytic approach complements existing approaches in design‐based learning research, and how our findings provide implications for research and practice

Affordance · Concept learning · Conceptual change · Educational technology · Human–computer interaction · Learning Sciences · Mathematics education · Science education · Sociology · Sophistication · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Design Education and Practice · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • Assessment of Conceptual Understanding in Student Learning About Liquefaction

    Open Access•Yi Zou, Ruqing Chen et al.•Research in Science Education•2026

  • Investigating Mechanistic Reasoning Through Student-Generated Sequential Diagrams and Written Explanations

    Open Access•Young-Eun Jeon, Mihye Won•Research in Science Education•2026

  • Using drawings and explanations based on attentive teaching as a means for understanding the social-ecological systems concept

    Adiv Gal, Yaron Schur et al.•Environmental Education Research•2022

  • Toward an Epistemology of Physics

    Andrea A Disessa•Cognition and Instruction•1993

  • Extending the use of soil survey information

    Open Access•R B Brown, Gerald A Miller•Journal of Agronomic Education•1989

  • Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom

    Janet L Kolodner, Paul J Camp et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2003

  • Mental models of the earth

    Open Access•Stella Vosniadou, William F Brewer•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • Characterising pre-service secondary science teachers’ noticing of different forms of evidence of student thinking

    Dirac Sze Him Lam, Kennedy Kam Ho Chan•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Conceptual Profile of Substance

    Open Access•Raúl Orduña Picón, Hannah Sevian et al.•Science & Education•2020

  • Informal formative assessment

    Open Access•Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli Ruiz‐Primo•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2011

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Preparing Teachers to Learn from Teaching

    Open Access•James Hiebert, Anne Morris et al.•Journal of Teacher Education•2007

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae