Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A National Review of State Laws for Stock Epinephrine in Schools

Bibliographic Data

ID21354151
AuthorsAnna Volerman (0000-0002-7406-1098, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 2007 Chicago IL 606037, corresponding author), Claire Brindley (0000-0002-5478-3974, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 2007 Chicago IL 60637), Nancy Amerson (Illinois Department of Public Health 535 W. Jefferson St Springfield IL 62761, corresponding author), Tiffanie Pressley (Illinois Department of Public Health 535 W. Jefferson St Springfield IL 62761), Nikki Woolverton (Illinois Department of Public Health 535 W. Jefferson St Springfield IL 62761, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume92
Issue2
Pages209-222
Publication date2022-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of School Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4391 • E-ISSN: 1746-1561
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/josh.13119
PMID34825371
OpenAlexW3215797019
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited11

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction with significant risk for children with allergies. Access to potentially life-saving medication is critical for these children. This review aims to describe state laws and policies guiding stock epinephrine in schools for allergic or anaphylactic events and detail recommendations for best practices. METHODS: This paper is a comprehensive review of the 50 states and the District of Columbia's (DC) laws and policies for stock epinephrine at schools for children in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade. RESULTS: All 50 states and DC allow undesignated epinephrine in schools to use for allergic or anaphylactic reactions. A key difference arises in whether states allow (N = 37) or mandate (N = 14) that schools stock epinephrine. States exhibit differences in the body responsible for developing stock epinephrine policy (N = 48), along with stakeholders responsible for developing procedures (N = 30) and implementing them (N = 19). Differences also exist in state epinephrine procurement, administration, training, and liability. CONCLUSIONS: This review of stock epinephrine laws and policies highlights the significant variation in state legislation despite widespread adoption. Only one-quarter of states mandate that schools have stock epinephrine available for emergency use, underscoring need for a more unified approach with consistent guidelines, comprehensive training, and possible funding for implementation.

Allergy · Anaphylaxis · Anesthesia · Business · Environmental health · Epinephrine · Family medicine · Legislation · Mandate · Political science · Stock (firearms) · Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization · Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions · Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research · Law · Medicine

  • More Work to Do to Achieve Epinephrine Access for All Children in Schools

    Open Access•Anna Volerman, Nikki Woolverton et al.•Journal of School Health•2022

  • All States Need Clear, Comprehensive, School‐Focused Stock Epinephrine Legislation

    Open Access•Madison A Oxford, Jennifer E Goertz et al.•Journal of School Health•2022

  • The Call for a School-Based Approach to Opioid Overdose Prevention

    Jessica B Calihan, Brittany L Carney et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2024

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae