Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The nature of racial superhumanization bias

Bibliographic Data

ID21355147
AuthorsPrachi Solanki (0000-0001-9139-2836, Michigan State University, corresponding author), Joseph Cesario (0000-0002-1892-4485, Michigan State University)
Year2024
Volume164
Issue6
Pages947-963
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4545 • E-ISSN: 1940-1183
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00224545.2023.2218995
PMID37249161
OpenAlexW4378746386
LanguageEN
References cited11

A superhumanization bias involves attribution of qualities that are beyond human to a certain group. Waytz and colleagues reported evidence supporting this bias among White Americans wherein Black targets were perceived as more capable of possessing superhuman qualities than White targets. We sought to better understand the nature of this effect by using different response scales (forced choice vs. Likert) and instruction sets (supporting vs. not supporting existence of superhuman abilities). Results across three studies replicate the superhumanization effect and demonstrate the necessity of several key methodological features; however, under the most realistic survey conditions (i.e. allowing unbiased decisions, being truthful about the existence of such abilities), no significant superhumanization bias emerged. Additionally, in conditions with significant bias, the size of the effect was relatively small, suggesting that this bias may not be as widespread as previously believed; indeed, only a minority of participants showed superhumanization in the predicted direction. Findings support the importance of exploring how arbitrary methodological decisions change inferences about psychological phenomena in the population

Attribution · Developmental psychology · Likert scale · Political science · Population · Replicate · Response bias · Scholarship · Sociology · Statistics · White (mutation) · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Dehumanization and Infrahumanization

    Nick Haslam, Steve Loughnan•Annual Review of Psychology•2014

  • Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis

    Open Access•Sara Steegen, Francis Tuerlinckx et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2016

  • The Multiverse of Methods

    Open Access•Jenna A Harder•Perspectives on Psychological…•2020

  • A Superhumanization Bias in Whites’ Perceptions of Blacks

    Open Access•Adam Waytz, Kelly M Hoffman et al.•Social Psychological and…•2015

  • No Place to Rest

    Melissa Harris-Lacewell•Women & Politics•2001

  • Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups

    Martin Trow, Catherine A Cottrell et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2005

  • Prejudice and perception

    B Keith Payne•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae