Liking gap(s) in getting-acquainted interactions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21355434 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sprecher (0000-0003-2940-4220, Illinois State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-6 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4545 • E-ISSN: 1940-1183 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00224545.2025.2576765 |
| PMID | 41128167 |
| OpenAlex | W4415468356 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
In first interactions, people often think about how much they like the other and how much the other likes them in return. Recently, a liking gap has been identified, which is the tendency for people to underestimate how much a new acquaintance likes them. With data from a compiled sample of pairs of strangers interacting for the first time, this investigation contributes to knowledge on how common it is to experience this perceived liking gap (versus no gap or an overestimation of how much one is liked). Also examined is an actual liking gap, the difference between how much people think they are liked by their interaction partner and how much the partner actually reports liking them in return. The liking gaps were found in the compiled sample and were robust across the individual studies and different conditions within the studies
Affect (linguistics) · Perception · Preference · Sample (material) · Social perception · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Social and Intergroup Psychology
The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness
Do they like me
Who will like me? Individual differences in the sources of meta-liking judgments at zero-acquaintance
Zooming” in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions
Evaluating the psychological and social nature of actual and perceived liking gaps
I Don't Think You like Me
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |