Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Highest Good as the Ideal of Reason in the Canon of the first Critique

Bibliographic Data

ID21355966
AuthorsLuigi Filieri (0009-0007-0934-9195, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Mainz Deutschland, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume115
Issue1
Pages24-45
Publication date2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueKant-Studien (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-8877 • E-ISSN: 1613-1134
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/kant-2023-2009
OpenAlexW4319438983
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

In the Dialectic of the first Critique , Kant claims that a highest being is the transcendental ideal of speculative reason. However, the Canon of the Doctrine of Method presents the highest good as an ideal of both the speculative and the practical use of reason. In this paper, I argue (1) that the highest good is the ideal of the unity of reason – unlike the ideal in the Dialectic – insofar as (2) the highest good serves both the speculative and the practical employment of reason. Accordingly, I also argue that (3) these two employments are complementary, not alternative. Kant’s argument for the ideal of the highest good in the Canon shows that the unity of reason combines the two lawful employments of reason. In order to be reason’s highest ideal, this ideal cannot just mirror the demands of speculative reason – it must also involve the other fundamental employment of reason, i. e., the practical. This highest standpoint cannot be merely speculative but must be moral as well: not just a highest ideal, but also a good (the highest good)

Argument (complex analysis) · Dialectic · Doctrine · Economics · Epistemology · Form of the Good · Ideal (ethics) · Order (exchange) · Theology · Transcendental number · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The Duty of Peace and the Minority of War. Arguments From Kant

    Open Access•Luigi Filieri•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2026

  • Community and Progress in Kant's Moral Philosophy

    Kate Moran, Kate A Moran•Community and Progress in Kant's…•2012

  • The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Frederick Rauscher•The Cambridge Companion to Kant's…•2010

  • The Powers of Pure Reason

    Alfredo Ferrarin•Powers of Pure Reason•2015

  • Autonomy After Auschwitz

    Martin Shuster•Autonomy after Auschwitz•2014

  • The Demand for Systematicity and the Authority of Theoretical Reason in Kant

    Open Access•Sasha Mudd•Kantian Review•2017

  • Happiness Proportioned to Virtue

    Open Access•Eoin O'Connell, Eoin O’Connell•Kantian Review•2012

  • Applying the Concept of the Good

    Andrea Esser, Andrea Marlen Esser•Highest Good in Kant's Philosophy•2016

  • The Determination of the Concept of the Highest Good

    Stephen Engstrom•Highest Good in Kant's Philosophy•2016

  • The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant's Moral Theory

    Stephen Engstrom•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1992

  • Kant's Theory of Normativity

    Open Access•Konstantin Pollok•Kant's Theory of Normativity•2017

  • Das höchste Gut in Kants deontologischer Ethik

    Florian Marwede•Höchste Gut in Kants Deontologische…•2018

  • Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant

    Andrews Reath•Journal of the history of…•1988

  • Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good

    Jacqueline Mariña, West Lafayette•Kant-Studien•2000

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae