Closing Arguments for the Defence

Howard Robinson believes, and would have the rest of us believe, that Gareth Moore was the equivalent of an atheist. To which I say, once again: there is not a single good reason to believe that Gareth was any such thing. I begin with a reminder about our duty to think of Gareth as innocent until proven guilty. I then argue that Gareth's insistence that there is no such thing as an invisible person named ‘God’ did not commit him to atheism. I show that people such as Herbert McCabe, whose orthodoxy is unimpeachable, say the same sort of thing. I then demonstrate that Gareth said nothing that would imply that, on his view, ‘God’ is not a referring expression. I end by explaining that Gareth embraced a theory of truth fully consistent with moderate expressivism

Atheism · Closing (real estate) · Commit · Duty · Epistemology · Expressivism · Nothing · Orthodoxy · Political science · Rest (music) · Theology · Computer Science · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Law · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification