The Creative Role of Virtue in Conscientious Objection

Recent debates in moral philosophy have placed significant emphasis on personal conscience, often elevating individual autonomy above all other considerations. This overemphasis has paradoxically led to the suppression of another’s conscience in situations where two moral agents must act together toward a shared goal, as in the physician–patient relationship. Critics of conscientious objection argue that recognizing its legitimacy fosters moral relativism or subjectivism. How, then, can conscience be properly formed and understood in a way that safeguards against relativism while upholding its rightful role in conscientious objection? This article argues that Aquinas’s integration of natural moral law, conscience, prudence, and virtue offers the most coherent and original framework for addressing these challenges. By grounding conscience in truth and sustaining it through virtue, Aquinas provides a robust basis for defending conscientious objection while safeguarding human dignity and moral integrity. While primarily theoretical, this study also draws practical implications for healthcare and institutional ethics, showing how a Thomistic understanding of virtue and conscience can inform dialogue and policy in pluralistic contexts

Autonomy · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Dignity · Legitimacy · Perspective (graphical) · Safeguarding · Virtue · Virtue ethics · Ethics in medical practice · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Patient Dignity and Privacy

• In search of Aquinas in Middle-earth

  Open Access•Joseph Renus F Galang•British Journal of Religious…•2026

  Add to list