Liturgy, Inculturation and the reception of Sacrosanctum concilium 37–40
An on-going project for those who preside
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21363357 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas O’loughlin (0000-0002-6333-3991, University of Nottingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 1102 |
| Pages | 967-978 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Blackfriars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-4289 • E-ISSN: 1741-2005 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/nbfr.12614 |
| OpenAlex | W3092177337 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
We are only now, after more than half a century, uncovering the real significance of what the Second Vatican Council means for the Church. The time lapse in reception has many factors not least that distinctive shifts in emphasis take far longer be appreciated in a real way that practical changes which, for good or ill, can be accomplished by fiat . So that the reception, fast or slow, of the Council is not a uniform process. One area where very little change has been seen is in relation to ‘adapting the Liturgy to the Temperament and Traditions of Peoples’. There was a call at the Council for a deliberate dialogical relationship between the liturgy and culture, and it is this relationship, rather than any particular modelling of it, that is the focus of this paper
Dialogical self · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Liturgy · Optics · Physics · Political science · Relation (database) · Sociology · Theology · Catholicism and Religious Studies · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Theology and Canon Law Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |