The Relation of Revelation and Tradition in the Theology of John Henry Newman and Joseph Ratzinger
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21363426 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David G Bonagura (St. Joseph’s Seminary and College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue | 1091 |
| Pages | 67-84 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Blackfriars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-4289 • E-ISSN: 1741-2005 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/nbfr.12469 |
| OpenAlex | W2923208551 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI called Blessed John Henry Newman “an important influence in my own life and thought.” In his memoirs, Ratzinger describes the energy with which Newman's work on conscience, history, and on the development of doctrine was read and discussed in his seminary days. Yet, in terms of Ratzinger's own work on history, tradition, and revelation, he makes almost no direct mention of Newman in his writings over his long theological career. This paper, by comparing the two theologians’ writings on the subject, seeks to ascertain whether and to what extent Newman's theology of tradition and revelation had an impact on Ratzinger's theology
Art history · Conscience · Doctrine · Epistemology · Memoir · Relation (database) · Revelation · Theology · Catholicism and Religious Studies · Christian Theology and Mission · History · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|