Accurate believers are deductively cogent
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21364045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Hewson (0000-0002-3532-107X, Oxford University Oxford UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 763-786 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Noûs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/nous.12397 |
| OpenAlex | W4200119393 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
This paper argues that the agent concerned to have accurate (outright) beliefs will have a consistent and multi‐premise closed belief set, and not a (merely) single‐premise closed and (merely) pairwise consistent belief set, as has often been thought. This argument rests on the fact that we need a notion of accuracy coherence for belief that is belief‐sensitive ; sensitive to one's perspective, in a way that the standard belief‐insensitive notion of accuracy coherence is not. The choice of the belief‐sensitive over belief‐insensitive notion is defended, as is the choice of this particular belief‐sensitive kind of accuracy coherence over other belief‐sensitive rivals. Our conclusion is that accurate believers are deductively cogent
Argument (complex analysis) · Belief revision · Belief system · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Epistemology · Pairwise comparison · Perspective (graphical) · Premise · Set (abstract data type) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Knowledge and Lotteries
Accuracy and the Laws of Credence
Probabilistic Knowledge
Beliefs, Degrees of Belief, and the Lockean Thesis
Justifying Conditionalization
Suspended judgment
What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?
The paradox of the preface
Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy
A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism
An Objective Justification of Bayesianism I
An Objective Justification of Bayesianism II
Immodest Inductive Methods
In Defence of Closure
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |