Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The question‐centered account of harm and benefit

Bibliographic Data

ID21364157
AuthorsAaron Thieme (0000-0003-1538-5639, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue4
Pages938-956
Publication date2024-12-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNoûs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0029-4624 • E-ISSN: 1468-0068
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/nous.12540
OpenAlexW4405411344
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited33

The counterfactual comparative account of harm and benefit (CCA) has faced a barrage of objections from cases involving preemption, overdetermination, and choice. In this paper I provide a unified diagnosis of CCA's vulnerability to these objections: CCA is susceptible to them because it evaluates each act by the same criterion. This is a mistake because, in a sense I make precise, situations raise prudential questions, and only some acts—the relevant alternatives —are directly relevant to these questions. To answer the objections, we must revise CCA so that its evaluations foreground the relevant alternatives. The result is a question‐centered account of harm and benefit

Criminology · Do no harm · Harm · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • What Harm Means

    Open Access•Yan Kai Zhou•Philosophy Compass•2026

  • The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics

    Open Access•Marie‐Christine Fritzsche, Charlotte Franziska Unruh•Bioethics•2026

  • Believe It or Not

    Open Access•Conner Schultz•Noûs•2025

  • Actualism and joint harm

    Open Access•Aaron Thieme•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People

    David Boonin•Non-Identity Problem and the…•2014

  • The Ethics of Killing

    Jeff Mcmahan•The ethics of killing•2002

  • Well-Being and Death

    Ben Bradley•Well-being and death•2009

  • Semantic analysis of wh-complements

    Open Access•Joroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof•Linguistics and Philosophy•1982

  • Indicative conditionals

    Open Access•Robert Stalnaker•philoSOPHIA•1975

  • New work for a theory of universals

    David Lewis•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1983

  • Reply to Klocksiem on the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm

    Open Access•Erik Carlson•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Questions in Action

    Daniel Hoek, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Well-Being Counterfactualist Accounts of Harm and Benefit

    Open Access•Erik Carlson, Jesper Johansson et al.•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Relevant implication

    Open Access•David Lewis•Theoria•1988

  • Harm, Failing to Benefit, and the Counterfactual Comparative Account

    Open Access•Justin Klocksiem•Utilitas•2022

  • Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death

    Fred Feldman•The Philosophical Review•1991

  • Doing Away with Harm1

    Open Access•Ben Bradley•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012

  • Plural Harm

    Open Access•Neil Feit•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2013

  • Causal decision theory, context, and determinism

    Open Access•Calum McNamara•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Prudential Problems for the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm and Benefit

    Open Access•Erik Carlson, Jesper Johansson et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae