Ein überflüssiger und ein nur ansatzweise richtiger Eingriff in den überlieferten Text von Ciceros Schrift De fato
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21370310 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hermann Weidemann (0009-0005-4076-0885, Leipzig Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 166 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-62 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-05 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philologus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-7985 • E-ISSN: 2196-7008 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/phil-2022-0109 |
| OpenAlex | W4287221809 |
| Language | DE |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
In the present article, proposed corrections to two passages of Cicero’s treatise De fato are examined. It is shown that, on the one hand, a widely accepted correction for §27 that replaces the well attested reading vera fuerunt instantia ... vera erunt instantia with vera fuerit instantia ... vera erit instantia is unnecessary, and that, on the other hand, my recently suggested correction for §48, which replaces the obviously false reading Nam si atomis ... , illud quoque ... with Aut num, si atomis ..., illud quoque ...? , is deficient and should be improved to Nam si atomis ..., num illud quoque
Linguistics · Reading (process) · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Classical Studies and Legal History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |