Die „Libation des Gottes“ und die Blendung des Kyklopen – Überlegungen zu Euripides’ Kyklops 469–471
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21370326 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sebastian Zerhoch (Institut für Religionswissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstraße 23–25, 14195 Berlin Freie Universität Berlin Institut für Religionswissenschaft Fabeckstraße 23-25 14195 Berlin Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 164 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-65 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philologus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-7985 • E-ISSN: 2196-7008 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/phil-2018-0024 |
| OpenAlex | W2898798841 |
| Language | DE |
| References cited | 13 |
The comparison by which the Chorus of Satyrs in Euripides’ C yclops 469–471 illustrates its wish to participate in the blinding of the Cyclops is regarded as difficult in research on the play, due to the ambiguous expression ὥσπερ ἐκ σπονδῆς θεοῦ (469). There is no consensus either on the question of how the reference to libation is to be understood, nor on whether the transmitted phrasing is correct at all. In the present paper I attempt to show that doubts over the transmission are unfounded and that attempts to refer the comparison not to libation but to the ritual use of water for handwashing at sacrifice are not persuasive. Rather, Euripides in this passage is engaging with the theme of libation on several levels of meaning: when we pay close attention to the context, cult-specific associations and literary applications of libation as a motif in Homer and Aristophanes, the words of the satyrs can be read, firstly, as a metaphorical reference to the two main actions in Odysseus’ plan for revenge, and secondly as a subtle allusion to the use of libation and spit-roasting in sacrificial ritual
Allusion · Art · Epistemology · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|