Ein interpoliertes Textstück im neunten Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21370330 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hermann Weidemann (0009-0005-4076-0885, Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 164 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 208-226 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philologus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-7985 • E-ISSN: 2196-7008 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/phil-2020-0120 |
| OpenAlex | W3101740710 |
| Language | DE |
| References cited | 9 |
The section 18b16– 25 of the famous chapter 9 of Aristotle’s De interpretatione presents two objections against the assumption that both members of a contradictory pair of future singular statements might be false. This section is unlikely to be genuine, because (1) the first objection is either directly begging the question or misusing a previous argument in a question-begging way, (2) the second objection includes irrelevant observations, and (3) the rebuttal of the said assumption interrupts the intimate connection between the immediately preceding and following sections
Argument (complex analysis) · Begging · Connection (principal bundle) · Epistemology · Political science · Rebuttal · Section (typography) · Theology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Law · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|