Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Circular and question-begging responses to religious disagreement and debunking arguments

Bibliographic Data

ID21370480
AuthorsAndrew Moon (0009-0008-7965-6606, Virginia Commonwealth University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume178
Issue3
Pages785-809
Publication date2021-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11098-020-01458-3
OpenAlexW3018530324
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited43

Argument (complex analysis) · Begging · Economics · Epistemology · Key (lock) · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Positive economics · Proposition · Sociology · Theology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Fit and Viable Determinants of Gamification in Christian Religious Studies in Developing Economy Context

    Alfred Patterson Akuetteh, Emmanuel Awuni Kolog et al.•Journal of Religion Media and…•2023

  • Kitartó keresztény hit, részrehajló episztemikus mércék és a disszenzus kihívásai

    Open Access•Bálint Békefi•Elpis Filozófiatudományi Folyóirat•2022

  • Three problems for the evolutionary debunking argument

    Open Access•Oscar Davis, Damian Cox•Ratio•2023

  • Why the debunking threat won’t go away

    Open Access•Halvor Kvandal•International Journal for…•2023

  • The ‘Diderot Objection’ to Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology

    Open Access•Imran Aijaz•Religious Studies•2024

  • In what sense is evolution blind to moral truth

    Open Access•Nellie Mckay•Synthese•2025

  • An argument for the perspectival account of faith

    Open Access•Chris Tweedt•Religious Studies•2025

  • Understanding Moral Disagreement

    Open Access•Bernice Mcallister•Religions•2021

  • Oxford Studies In Epistemology

    Tamar Szabó Gendler, John Hawthorne•Oxford studies in epistemology.•2005

  • Warranted Christian Belief

    Alvin Plantinga•Warranted Christian belief•2000

  • Justification without Awareness

    Michael Bergmann•JUSTIFICATION WITHOUT AWARENESS:…•2006

  • Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence

    Thomas Kelly•Disagreement•2010

  • What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?

    Open Access•James Pryor•Philosophical Issues•2004

  • Reasonable Religious Disagreements

    Richard Feldman, Richard M Feldman•Philosophers without gods•2007

  • The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement

    Thomas J Kelly, Thomas Kelly•Oxford studies in epistemology.•2005

  • The X-claim argument against religious belief

    Open Access•Stephen Law•Religious Studies•2018

  • You Just Believe That Because…1

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • When Transmission Fails

    Christopher J Tucker, Christopher Tucker•The Philosophical Review•2010

  • Irrelevant Influences

    Open Access•Katia Vavova•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • The Reflective Epistemic Renegade

    Open Access•Bryan Frances•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2010

  • Easy Knowledge

    Open Access•Peter J Markie•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005

  • Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion

    Kelly James Clark, Justin L Barrett•Journal of the American Academy…•2011

  • Recent work in reformed epistemology

    Open Access•Andrew Moon•Philosophy Compass•2016

  • Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis

    Open Access•Fernando Romero•Philosophy Compass•2019

  • Religious Diversity and its Challenges to Religious Belief

    Open Access•Nathan L King, Nathan King•Philosophy Compass•2008

  • Debunking arguments

    Open Access•Daniel Z Korman•Philosophy Compass•2019

  • The Bootstrapping Problem

    Open Access•Jonathan Weisberg•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • Defeaters and Higher-Level Requirements

    Michael Bergmann•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae