Many more reasons
Critical notes on Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21370484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Federico Pailos (0000-0001-9991-2760, University of Tübingen, corresponding author), Agustina Borzi (0009-0008-4368-0444, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Joaquin S Toranzo Calderón (0000-0003-1297-0912, National Technological University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 183 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 2023-2032 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-026-02483-4 |
| OpenAlex | W7127330588 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
The main aim of this critical note is to assess some of the different forms in which Hlobil and Brandom’s logical approach, as it was introduced in Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons , can be improved or expanded
Logical consequence · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of logic · Philosophy of mind · Term logic · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|