Issues of Expertise in Perception and Imagination
Commentary on Stokes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21371267 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amy Kind (0000-0001-9513-8704, Claremont McKenna College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1749-1756 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-023-02018-1 |
| OpenAlex | W4385382371 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
In this commentary on Dustin Stokes’ Thinking and Perceiving , I focus on his discussion of perceptual expertise. This discussion occurs in the context of his case against modularity assumptions that underlie much contemporary theorizing about perception. As I suggest, there is much to be gained from thinking about considerations about perceptual expertise in conjunction with considerations about imaginative skill. In particular, I offer three different lessons that we can learn by way of the joint consideration of these two phenomena
Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Metaphysics · Modularity (biology) · Perception · Philosophy of mind · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |