Their Hegemony—and Theirs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21371600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dana L Cloud (independent scholar, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-185 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-15 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy and Rhetoric (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8213 • E-ISSN: 1527-2079 |
| Publisher | The Pennsylvania State University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171 |
| OpenAlex | W4243363906 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
This essay explores the concept of hegemony as it is differently elaborated by Perry Anderson and Peter Thomas. I first provide an orientation to Gramsci's theory of hegemony and how it has been taken up in cultural and rhetorical studies. Then I explore Anderson's interventions into hegemony theory in the earlier Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci before a substantial review of The H-Word. I then discuss Peter Thomas's critique of Anderson's orientation to the hegemonic constructs of the ruling classes of nation-states and conclude with a discussion about how the concept of hegemony elaborated by these authors might productively extend the work we do as scholars of rhetoric
Cultural hegemony · Epistemology · Hegemony · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political theory and Gramsci · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Toward a Gramscian critical rhetoric
Hegemony in a mass‐mediated society
Hegemony or concordance? The rhetoric of tokenism in “Oprah” Oprah rags‐to‐riches biography
The Matrix and Critical Theory's Desertion of the Real
Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
To “Feel” and to “Understand” Political Struggle
| Highly cited | No |
|---|